Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Several months ago reports started popping up that Cuddeback was set to release a new trail camera for this fall, called the Capture.  As one of the more widely recognized names in the industry needless to say we were excited to see what these new cameras would offer.  This past week our first Capture arrived at the office.  Here are our first impressions.

There are two models of the new Capture available, one with standard flash and one with an IR flash.  Both cameras are 3.0 megapixels in both day and night, and are priced very reasonably.  The standard Capture retails for $199.99 and the IR version for $229.99.  To date only the standard-flash cameras have shipped out so that’s what we’ve had the chance to test.

If you’ve seen any of the new print or TV ads for this product you’ll notice that the main feature Cuddeback is trying to push is the ease of use.  A lot of cameras we’ve tested have settings that are buried several levels deep into the menus and can be somewhat cumbersome to figure out at first.  Let’s face it, none of us want to sit around and read a 20 page manual and spend an hour trying to figure out how to use our trail cameras.  We want to open them up, put batteries in them, strap them on a tree, and be on our way.  With the Cuddeback Capture, you can do just that.

Both Capture units feature a new rotating dial system for controlling the camera settings and arming the camera in the field.  There are only two push buttons, which are only used for your initial time/date/year setup.  Once you take care of those, which takes less than a minute, you don’t have to use them again.  Once your camera is set up and in position you simply rotate the dial to the time delay you want (30 seconds, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, or 30 minutes), close the cover and walk away.  It truly is a very user-friendly interface.

Like the older Cuddeback cameras the new Capture also uses 4 D-Cell batteries for power.  Although unlike my C2000 Excite the battery system is much easier to use.  The batteries actually slide into the case underneath the main cover and aren’t held in by that cheesy metal plate that I always had problems with in the past.
Also new with the Capture units is the switch from Compact Flash (CF) cards over to the more industry-standard SD cards found in most other manufacturer’s units.  This is great for those of us who have a bunch of cameras and have been managing different types of cards.  Not to mention SD cards are more readily available and cheaper than CF cards.  A big thumbs up to Cuddeback for finally making the switch.

My one complaint on this camera is the fact that they did away with the screw-in fastening system found on my older units.  I really liked this method as it added one small measure of security for my cameras.  I could screw them in, fasten the face plate, then put a small padlock on it that made it more difficult for thieves to run off with.  The new Capture units no longer have this option and instead come with a more traditional strap system.  It works fine for what it is, but now there is no easy option for locking the Capture unit to the tree.  Even if you put a padlock on the door that only prevents someone from opening it, not from removing the strap from the tree and taking the whole unit.  Definitely a step backwards in my opinion.

My new Cuddeback Capture went out to the field last night and I plan on checking it next Saturday to see how the trigger speed, flash range, and image quality is.  I tested it inside my house a few times before putting it out and the trigger speed looks like it’s on par with my older Cuddeback units, and image quality definitely appears to be higher than my C2000 Excite.  As soon as I have an update, you’ll be the first to know!

If you'd like to purchase a new Cuddeback Capture digital trail camera we have them in stock and ready to ship right here at TrailCam.com!  Retail cost is $199.99 and you can purcahse your new Cuddeback Capture by clicking here.

Published Monday, August 25, 2008 8:33 AM by Justin_Zarr

Comments

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Monday, October 06, 2008 9:38 AM by Chris

Great camera BUT it was stolen .No way to secure it (can not belocked to tree.Wont be purchasing another one from cuddeback for this reson.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Monday, October 20, 2008 12:35 PM by Ben

Is there no way to jimmy-rig a locking system for this camera?  Like could you loop a small cable through somewhere?  I want one of these but NEED to lock it up.  Any advice?

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Sunday, November 09, 2008 11:54 AM by Randy

I purchased a cable and lock, rap the cable around the tree and loop one end through the other and secure to camera. Someone would have to have bolt cutters or a chain saw to steal your camera

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Friday, November 14, 2008 8:14 AM by Justin Zarr

If you had a small enough cable you could loop it through the lock hole on the bottom and around the tree, but it would have to be pretty thin.  The hole isn't very big at all, and is meant more for a small padlock than a cable.  But you could jimmy rig something if you absolutely needed to.

Or you can purchase the "Bear Proof" lock box and lock it up that way.  It costs a few extra bucks, but is probably worth it to protect your investment in the long run.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Wednesday, November 26, 2008 8:54 AM by Tom

I bought the capture IR and has been very dissappointed. It will not take anything beyond 10 feet at night. All I see are shiny eyeballs. In addition, the batteries lasted less than 1 week in single digit temps. Called cuddebackc and they told me that my objects are too far away and it's normal for batteries to run out in single digit or O degree weather. I expect more from cuddeback.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Sunday, December 07, 2008 1:43 PM by jerry

I just bought a capture IR and I am very disappointed with it. I had it set at 6 yards from a trail and all I got was a black grainy looking piture with a eye glowing. Even the day picture quality was poor. Batteries are about dead after 18 pictures and five days out in the cold. I will be returning it to the retailer that I bought it from. I won't pay $230.00 for something that plain doesn't work.  Shame on cuddeback for such a poor camera.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 10:40 AM by Justin Zarr

Sorry to hear about your problems with the IR unit.  I just purcahsed one last week and put it out on my lease.  I won't be back down to check it for two weeks, but I'm hoping that the batteries last at least that long.  I'll make sure to update the blog with a new entry once I have some images to show.  I did test it out in a dark room here at our office and it worked pretty well.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Friday, December 19, 2008 9:03 AM by Kevin Tejas

I have had my capture IR out for over 3 weeks on the same set of Duracells. Pictures are good except in night time foggy or misty conditions. Just trying to figure out how to format the card after viewing the pictures.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Friday, December 19, 2008 12:06 PM by Bob Garrett

Just bought my 5th Cuddeback ( A Capture). Should have read these before I bought it. If I have as much trouble with this one as the others, it will be my last. First one failed after two seasons. $120 to repair. Expert and Excite are in for repair now after 2 seasons. $80 and $70 to repair. No Flash was still working last time I checked. New capture has only been out 1 week so no opinion yet.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Friday, December 19, 2008 2:51 PM by Lee

Nighttime pics are just ok, deer have to be close. Daytime pictures are terrible, way too dark. For example on a sunny day with all kinds of white snow around, I could barely make out some turkeys in my pictures. Works the same in the house, poor camera.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Friday, January 02, 2009 9:46 AM by Brian

I purchased a cable that had a 4 digit combination lock and a sepatate pad lock.  Simply wrap the cable around the tree and then put the pad lock trough the hole on the camera and around the cable.  It just keeps honest people honest though.  As far as batteries, they dont make batteries that will last very long in single digit weather; but dont blame that on cuddeback.  I havent had mine out very long and mine is the flash model but results are excellent. After all its a camera to monitor animals when your not there. Not a camera to take professional photographs.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Friday, January 09, 2009 8:26 AM by Cody

if you want to secure and have a lock on your cuddeback get a bear safe. you screw it into the tree and just add a padlock. it works good. its a heavy duty safe.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Wednesday, January 14, 2009 7:01 PM by chad

had mine out since the 1st of jan no problems still same batteries but i get some black pics every now and again

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Monday, January 19, 2009 11:08 AM by mike

this was the best 200 dollars i have spent

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Monday, January 19, 2009 11:12 AM by bt

i have had mine since christmas and have not had any problems with it

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Saturday, April 11, 2009 11:16 PM by John

I haven't tried this camera yet. Whats with the 3.0 mega pixels. Wal-mart sells a Remington 5.0 mega pixel camera for $125. Cuddeback should really lower their prices. The capture should only be around $70.00 and thats it. I have other stuff, I want to buy. I want a Glen dale full rut deer target = $220. Gee wizz. I want to pay a farmer to leave a couple of acres of corn standing. Cuddeback capture is way to expensive just like most other cameras.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Monday, April 13, 2009 1:01 PM by Erik

Cuddeback is probably one of the easiest user friendly cameras I have used.  Yeah, wal-mart sells a remington for 125, but you get what you pay for.  It is slow, half of the pictures didn't have anything on them.  My batteries on the cuddeback lasted over a month and had 130 pictures on it.  I would spend more money on things that will actually help you get more deer you are looking for rather than a target for 220 dollars expecially if you don't have the money.

# re: Cuddeback Capture: First Look

Thursday, May 14, 2009 9:55 AM by wesly

how do you guys gat all these deers

Hunting Network, LLC
11964 Oak Creek Parkway
Huntley, IL 60142
847-659-8200
info@trailcam.com
Bowhunting.Com HuntingNet.Com Powered by
ICS Solutions
Design by
Rhino Group
Your online bowhunting resource The largest hunting community ICS Solutions IT and Web Hosting Custom website design and development
foodplots.com | huntingsweepstakes.com | shotplacement.com | papertuning.com | choketubes.com